“Thursdays with GWW” meetings
This Thursday, May 30, we invite you to the next meeting in the Thursdays with GWW series. This is a new form of meetings at the offices of GWW in Rzeszów. During short, lasting 2-3 hours, classes in a small group, GWW lawyers talk with practitioners about problems related to new legal regulations. Tomorrow’s meeting will be devoted to changes in industry regulations adopted in order to ensure the application of the GDPR and their effects on entrepreneurs.
Ines Borkowska attorney-at-law and Piotr Czajka attorney-at-law will talk about changes introduced in labor law, commercial activities and the medical sector by means of the so-called GDPR Implementing Act. If you are interested in participating in the training, please send your applications to the following address: edyta.gdula@gww.pl
There is a limited number of places. Participation is free of charge.
As part of Thursdays with GWW we had the opportunity to meet entrepreneurs twice. The topics of the meeting were:
- Single Control File – automatic examination of VAT records. Analytical tools supporting accounting work in the area of VAT. / May 23, 2019
- What can we expect in terms of VAT? / April 11, 2019
Follow our Linkedin profile and our news, where we will be informing about next meetings.
Related posts
New regulations on transparency of remuneration in the recruitment process
New regulations on transparency of remuneration in the recruitment processLABOUR LAW NEWSLETTER – collective labour agreements under new rules
LABOUR LAW NEWSLETTER – collective labour agreements under new rules
Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?
news Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?
Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?Flavourings with alcohol. CJEU: it is the intended purpose that counts, not the actual use
Flavourings with alcohol. CJEU: it is the intended purpose that counts, not the actual useConcerned about
missing out
on key legal
developments?