InPost wins dispute with former postal monopoly
On 23 January 2015 the Warsaw Regional Court rejected Poczta Polska’s complaint against a ruling by the National Appeals Chamber (KIO) in a tender to provide mailing services for the Agricultural Social Insurance Fund (KRUS). The team of GWW attorneys engaged in the project was led by Krystian Szostak, the partner responsible for GWWs litigation practice.
– “After hearing the appeal against the National Appeals Chamber’s ruling, the court ruled that InPost was in the right,” says Kryistian. “The company is making further inroads into the market of postal services for public institutions, which will save millions of zlotys for Polish taxpayers.”
GWW represented InPost before the National Appeals Chamber concerning a tender to deliver correspondence for the Agricultural Social Insurance Fund, as well as in an appeal before the Regional Court in Warsaw.
Krystian Szostak led the team of GWW lawyers, comprising: Paweł Rożyński, an expert in public procurement and PPP issues, and Katarzyna Blachowicz, an attorney-at-law (radca prawny).
This adds to GWW’s record of success in disputes with Poczta Polska; the earlier win concerned a tender to provide mailing services for courts and prosecutors. For more information, please see: GWW’s win in postal tender.
Related posts
Is the sale of private plots always considered economic activity subject to VAT? Article.
Is the sale of private plots always considered economic activity subject to VAT? Article.
Landmark ruling by the Supreme Administrative Court in a holding company dismissal case – a success for the GWW team
Landmark ruling by the Supreme Administrative Court in a holding company dismissal case – a success for the GWW teamNew excise duty declarations from 1 July 2025 – what you need to know
New excise duty declarations from 1 July 2025 – what you need to know''The Devil in vestments'' - on tax authorities overstepping the bounds of legal action
''The Devil in vestments'' - on tax authorities overstepping the bounds of legal actionConcerned about
missing out
on key legal
developments?