Ministerial tools for sending new JPK files not for everyone
The Ministry of Finance launched an application for sending new uniform control files with the tax return. They need to be submitted for the first time by 25 November. However, experts point out that only small companies will use the tools shared by the office – it is impossible to send large files.
COMMENTARY by Marcin Kopczyk
Marcin Kopczyk, tax advisor at GWW, also draws attention to the limitation of the size of the transferred file to 100 MB. It will be possible to send a file containing no more than 60 thousand invoices with the use of the JPK_WEB Klient application. The Ministry of Finance explained that when the size of the JPK_V7 file exceeds 100 MB, other methods of transferring files, including commercial applications, should be used.
– Once again, the tax administration provides information important for taxpayers, which may has a negative impact on their business activities, at the very last moment. When preparing the JPK_WEB Klient application, the Ministry of Finance had to be aware for a long time that the file size will be limited – points out Marcin Kopczyk.
The article was published on Prawo.pl: https://www.prawo.pl/podatki/jpk_vat-i-ograniczenia-aplikacji-jpk_web-rozliczenie-jpk-z,504273.html
Related posts
New regulations on transparency of remuneration in the recruitment process
New regulations on transparency of remuneration in the recruitment processLABOUR LAW NEWSLETTER – collective labour agreements under new rules
LABOUR LAW NEWSLETTER – collective labour agreements under new rules
Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?
news Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?
Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?Flavourings with alcohol. CJEU: it is the intended purpose that counts, not the actual use
Flavourings with alcohol. CJEU: it is the intended purpose that counts, not the actual useConcerned about
missing out
on key legal
developments?