If a shopping center or part of a store is closed on the grounds of a government decision, then the entire building or part thereof should not be subject to tax on building revenues.
This viewpoint was presented by the Ministry of Finance in response to questions asked by Dziennik Gazeta Prawna. This is a favorable viewpoint for taxpayers, however if we comply with it, we do it at our own risk, since it is not an official interpretation of the Ministry. Taxpayers who want to obtain an answer binding for themselves must apply for individual interpretations. Only thus they will get protection.
Commentary by Mateusz Pietranek, a tax advisor from the CIT team, for Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.
As Mateusz Pietranek, a tax advisor from GWW Tax, adds, if interpretations of the Director of the National Tax Information (KIS) is consistent with the position of the Ministry of Finance, this would mean a reduction in tax burden for owners and joint owners of commercial facilities with area exceeding 2,000 sq. m. They should then analyze what part of the building was actually excluded from operation due to trading prohibition and what premises were allowed to conduct business in order to correctly determine the amount of tax liability. Pursuant to Article 24b paragraph 6 of the CIT Act, if a building has been put into use in part, the revenue shall be determined in proportion to the share of the usable floor space put into use in the total usable floor space of that building. The proportion shall be determined on the first day of each month in relation to the initial value of the taxable building resulting from the records kept. – Of course, if 100 percent of the building area was prohibited from running business activities, there will be no taxation on revenues from buildings at all – says Pietranek.
What about smaller centers
Mateusz Pietranek points out that the position of the Ministry of Finance does not apply to owners or co-owners of premises in commercial facilities with an area of less than 2,000 sq. m. The Special Act and Article 15ze do not refer to such centers. So, if a landlord in smaller commercial facilities has agreed rent suspension with a tenant, the tax authorities may decide that the landlord must still pay the tax (provided that the other conditions are met).
The whole article is available in Dziennik Gazeta Prawna: https://gospodarka.dziennik.pl/news/artykuly/7738220,koronawirus-sklep-centrum-handlowe-zamkniecie-podatek-oplata.html