2017 Ranking of Regulatory Law Firms
Polityka Insight – an analytical centre generating and popularising information about politics, the economy and European affairs – announced the results of the 2nd edition of the Ranking of Regulatory Law Firms. The Ranking covers firms that give regulatory advice connected with public business law executed by authorities such as the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK), the Office of Electronic Communications (UKE), the Energy Regulatory Office (URE) and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF).
GWW law firm has come top in the “Telecommunications” category for the second year in a row.
The ‘gold’ in such a prestigious ranking confirms the excellent condition of GWW’s telecommunications practice, as also noted by international rating companies who have awarded us the accolade of leader and/or recommended law firm for legal services provided to TMT (telecommunications, media, new technologies) entities every year since 2007.

IMAGE: Wacław Knopkiewicz accepting the diploma for GWW.
Polityka Insight’s ranking is the only qualitative analysis of the law firm sector in Poland, based, among other things, on survey responses from Polish law firms and their clients – the largest companies in regulated sectors.
Detailed results are available on Polityka Insight’s website, link here.
Related posts
New regulations on transparency of remuneration in the recruitment process
New regulations on transparency of remuneration in the recruitment processLABOUR LAW NEWSLETTER – collective labour agreements under new rules
LABOUR LAW NEWSLETTER – collective labour agreements under new rules
Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?
news Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?
Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?Flavourings with alcohol. CJEU: it is the intended purpose that counts, not the actual use
Flavourings with alcohol. CJEU: it is the intended purpose that counts, not the actual useConcerned about
missing out
on key legal
developments?