GWW Tax reaches the top 10 in its field
Since 2010, our tax advisors have steadily improved their position in all ranking lists — an effort that has culminated in the inclusion of GWW Tax among the top 10 advisory firms in Poland. Notably, in the Rzeczpospolita ranking, were competing not just with law firms, but also with firms including the Big Four.
GWW achieved the following positions in sub-rankings:
- quantitative – we advanced to 10th place from 11th (up from 13th two years ago)
- revenue – first place among law firms and a rise to 11th place from 13th in the overall ranking
- qualitative – a strong substantive performance, as demonstrated by a list of the leading transactions and cases, as well as our client list.
The Rzeczpospolita ranking builds on achievements by GWWs tax practice, which operates under the GWW Tax brand, and which reached leading positions in earlier surveys this year. In March we were listed among the top five in the ranking of the most effective tax advisory firms and among the best tax advisory firms in the 8th edition of Dziennik Gazeta Prawna newspapers prestigious Ranking of Tax Firms and Advisors.
In that same ranking, our tax advisors reached the medal stand with individual awards in three categories. Were especially proud of Andrzej Próchnicki, ranked No. 1 in the income tax category. More about his award.
Related posts
New regulations on transparency of remuneration in the recruitment process
New regulations on transparency of remuneration in the recruitment processLABOUR LAW NEWSLETTER – collective labour agreements under new rules
LABOUR LAW NEWSLETTER – collective labour agreements under new rules
Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?
news Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?
Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?Flavourings with alcohol. CJEU: it is the intended purpose that counts, not the actual use
Flavourings with alcohol. CJEU: it is the intended purpose that counts, not the actual useConcerned about
missing out
on key legal
developments?