Andrzej Próchnicki among the ranks of best advisors
Andrzej Próchnicki wins first place in the “Income Tax” category. The justification reads “(…) The team lead by this advisor contributed to working out optimal tax solutions pertaining to the principles and dates of recognising tax deductible costs on account of interest, commission and costs of advisory services on significant amounts of external financing. The most significant task that Andrzej Próchnicki had to deal with was the issue of tax succession and the possibility of its application with reference to the acquiring company in the merger of two entities. (…)”
At the same time, the following also figured amongst the ranks of the best tax advisors:
Article Cmoch – second place in the “Tax Optimisation category”;
Leszek Białoń – third place in the “Mergers and Acquisitions” category.
This means that GWW is ranked among the leaders when it comes to individual distinctions awarded to tax advisors.
Furthermore, GWW’s tax practice, run under the GWW Tax brand, has unfailingly been in the top five in the category “Most Effective Tax Advisory Firms” since 2010, and was “Best Tax Advisory Firm 2011”. This category in the current edition sees us in fourth and fifth place respectively in the large companies group (employing 10 or more tax advisors).
75 of the best and most dynamic advisory firms on the market took part in the VIII Ranking.
View the entire publication
Related posts
New regulations on transparency of remuneration in the recruitment process
New regulations on transparency of remuneration in the recruitment processLABOUR LAW NEWSLETTER – collective labour agreements under new rules
LABOUR LAW NEWSLETTER – collective labour agreements under new rules
Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?
news Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?
Political agreement on abolishing the €150 threshold for e-commerce shipments – changes as early as 2026?Flavourings with alcohol. CJEU: it is the intended purpose that counts, not the actual use
Flavourings with alcohol. CJEU: it is the intended purpose that counts, not the actual useConcerned about
missing out
on key legal
developments?